Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Alethe
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Iterations
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Analyze
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Admin message
Pour rappel, le service sera inaccessible ce lundi 05/05/25 midi pour raison de mise à jour.
Show more breadcrumbs
veriT
Alethe
Commits
d22450c7
Commit
d22450c7
authored
3 years ago
by
Hans-Jörg
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Another footnote tweak
parent
47366fc1
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request
!1
PxTP Extended Abstract
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
publications/pxtp21/extended_abstract.tex
+2
-2
2 additions, 2 deletions
publications/pxtp21/extended_abstract.tex
with
2 additions
and
2 deletions
publications/pxtp21/extended_abstract.tex
+
2
−
2
View file @
d22450c7
...
...
@@ -126,8 +126,8 @@ reconstruction of proofs from the SMT solver CVC4~\cite{Barrett2011} in
Coq, where its proofs in the LFSC format~
\cite
{
Stump2013
}
were
first translated into the veriT format before reconstruction.
%
Finally, the format will also be natively supported in the upcoming cvc5
solver
\footnote
{
\url
{
https://cvc4.github.io/2021/04/02/cvc5-announcement.html
}}
.
Finally, the format will also be natively supported in the upcoming cvc5
.
solver
\footnote
{
\url
{
https://cvc4.github.io/2021/04/02/cvc5-announcement.html
}}
On the one hand, Alethe uses a
natural-deduction style calculus driven mostly by resolution~
\cite
{
besson-2011
}
.
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment