Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Alethe
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Iterations
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Analyze
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Admin message
Pour rappel, le service sera inaccessible ce lundi 05/05/25 midi pour raison de mise à jour.
Show more breadcrumbs
veriT
Alethe
Commits
a1ae1c83
Commit
a1ae1c83
authored
1 year ago
by
Hans-Jörg
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Add more check placeholders
parent
ef78c662
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline
#20274
passed
1 year ago
Changes
1
Pipelines
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
althelf/rules.smt3
+88
-11
88 additions, 11 deletions
althelf/rules.smt3
with
88 additions
and
11 deletions
althelf/rules.smt3
+
88
−
11
View file @
a1ae1c83
...
...
@@ -522,63 +522,135 @@
:conclusion CL
)
; TODO: sidecondition
;TODO
(program check_xor_pos1 ((CL Bool))
(Bool) Bool
(
((check_xor_pos1 CL) true)
)
)
;TRUST
(declare-rule xor_pos1 ((CL Bool))
:args (CL)
:requires ((check_xor_pos1 CL) true)
:conclusion CL
)
; TODO: sidecondition
;TODO
(program check_xor_pos2 ((CL Bool))
(Bool) Bool
(
((check_xor_pos2 CL) true)
)
)
;TRUST
(declare-rule xor_pos2 ((CL Bool))
:args (CL)
:requires ((check_xor_pos2 CL) true)
:conclusion CL
)
; TODO: sidecondition
;TODO
(program check_xor_neg1 ((CL Bool))
(Bool) Bool
(
((check_xor_neg1 CL) true)
)
)
;TRUST
(declare-rule xor_neg1 ((CL Bool))
:args (CL)
:requires ((check_xor_neg1 CL) true)
:conclusion CL
)
; TODO: sidecondition
;TODO
(program check_xor_neg2 ((CL Bool))
(Bool) Bool
(
((check_xor_neg2 CL) true)
)
)
;TRUST
(declare-rule xor_neg2 ((CL Bool))
:args (CL)
:requires ((check_xor_neg2 CL) true)
:conclusion CL
)
; TODO: sidecondition
;TODO
(program check_implies_pos ((CL Bool))
(Bool) Bool
(
((check_implies_pos CL) true)
)
)
;TRUST
(declare-rule implies_pos ((CL Bool))
:args (CL)
:requires ((check_implies_pos CL) true)
:conclusion CL
)
; TODO: sidecondition
;TODO
(program check_implies_neg1 ((CL Bool))
(Bool) Bool
(
((check_implies_neg1 CL) true)
)
)
;TRUST
(declare-rule implies_neg1 ((CL Bool))
:args (CL)
:requires ((check_implies_neg1 CL) true)
:conclusion CL
)
; TODO: sidecondition
;TODO
(program check_implies_neg2 ((CL Bool))
(Bool) Bool
(
((check_implies_neg2 CL) true)
)
)
;TRUST
(declare-rule implies_neg2 ((CL Bool))
:args (CL)
:requires ((check_implies_neg2 CL) true)
:conclusion CL
)
; TODO: sidecondition
;TODO
(program check_equiv_pos1 ((CL Bool))
(Bool) Bool
(
((check_equiv_pos1 CL) true)
)
)
;TRUST
(declare-rule equiv_pos1 ((CL Bool))
:args (CL)
:requires ((check_equiv_pos1 CL) true)
:conclusion CL
)
; TODO: sidecondition
;TODO
(program check_equiv_pos2 ((CL Bool))
(Bool) Bool
(
((check_equiv_pos2 CL) true)
)
)
;TRUST
(declare-rule equiv_pos2 ((CL Bool))
:args (CL)
:requires ((check_equiv_pos2 CL) true)
...
...
@@ -599,6 +671,7 @@
:conclusion CL
)
;TRUST
(declare-rule ite1 ((phi1 Bool) (phi2 Bool) (phi3 Bool) (CL Bool)
:premises ((cl (ite phi1 phi2 phi3)))
:args (CL)
...
...
@@ -606,6 +679,7 @@
:conclusion CL
)
;TRUST
(declare-rule ite2 ((phi1 Bool) (phi2 Bool) (phi3 Bool) (CL Bool)
:premises ((cl (ite phi1 phi2 phi3)))
:args (CL)
...
...
@@ -641,6 +715,7 @@
:conclusion CL
)
;TRUST
(declare-rule not_ite1 ((phi1 Bool) (phi2 Bool) (phi3 Bool) (CL Bool))
:premises ((cl (not (ite phi1 phi2 phi3))))
:args (CL)
...
...
@@ -648,6 +723,7 @@
:conclusion CL
)
;TRUST
(declare-rule not_ite2 ((phi1 Bool) (phi2 Bool) (phi3 Bool) (CL Bool))
:premises ((cl (not (ite phi1 phi2 phi3))))
:args (CL)
...
...
@@ -714,13 +790,14 @@
; TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule ite_simplify ((l Bool) (r Bool))
:args ((cl (= l r)))
:requires ((check_
simplify
_simplify l r) true)
:requires ((check_
ite
_simplify l r) true)
:conclusion (cl (= l r))
)
; TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule qnt_simplify ((l Bool) (r Bool))
:args ((cl (= l r)))
:requires ((check_
simplify
_simplify l r) true)
:requires ((check_
qnt
_simplify l r) true)
:conclusion (cl (= l r))
)
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment