Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Alethe
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Iterations
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Analyze
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
veriT
Alethe
Commits
94edabdf
Commit
94edabdf
authored
1 year ago
by
Hans-Jörg
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
More simple rules
parent
8cc04c44
No related branches found
Branches containing commit
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline
#20001
passed
1 year ago
Changes
1
Pipelines
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
althelf/alethe.smt3
+88
-72
88 additions, 72 deletions
althelf/alethe.smt3
with
88 additions
and
72 deletions
althelf/alethe.smt3
+
88
−
72
View file @
94edabdf
...
...
@@ -243,121 +243,137 @@
:match-conclusion CL
)
% I am here
(declare-rule and_pos ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule and_neg ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_and_neg CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule and_neg ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule or_pos ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_or_pos CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule or_pos ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule or_neg ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_or_neg CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule or_neg ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule xor_pos1 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_xor_pos1 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule xor_pos1 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule xor_pos2 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_xor_pos2 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule xor_pos2 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule xor_neg1 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_xor_neg1 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule xor_neg1 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule xor_neg2 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_xor_neg2 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule xor_neg2 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule implies_pos ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_implies_pos CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule implies_pos ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule implies_neg1 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_implies_neg1 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule implies_neg1 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule implies_neg2 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_implies_neg2 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule implies_neg2 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule equiv_pos1 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_equiv_pos1 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule equiv_pos1 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule equiv_pos2 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_equiv_pos2 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule equiv_pos2 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule equiv_neg1 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_equiv_neg1 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule equiv_neg1 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule equiv_neg2 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_equiv_neg2 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule equiv_neg2 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
(declare-rule ite1 ((phi1 Bool) (phi2 Bool) (phi3 Bool) (CL Bool)
:premises ((ite phi1 phi2 phi3))
:requires ((clEqual (cl phi1 phi3) CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule ite1 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
(declare-rule ite2 ((phi1 Bool) (phi2 Bool) (phi3 Bool) (CL Bool)
:premises ((ite phi1 phi2 phi3))
:requires ((clEqual (cl (not phi1) phi2) CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule ite2 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
)
(declare-rule ite_pos1 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule ite_pos1 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_ite_pos1 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule ite_pos2 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule ite_pos2 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_ite_pos2 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule ite_neg1 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule ite_neg1 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_ite_neg1 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule ite_neg2 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
% TODO: sidecondition
(declare-rule ite_neg2 ((CL Bool))
:requires ((check_ite_neg2 CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule not_ite1 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
(declare-rule not_ite1 ((phi1 Bool) (phi2 Bool) (phi3 Bool) (CL Bool))
:premises ((not (ite phi1 phi2 phi3)))
:requires ((clEqual (cl phi1 (not phi3)) CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule not_ite2 ()
:args ()
:conclusion true
(declare-rule not_ite2 ((phi1 Bool) (phi2 Bool) (phi3 Bool) (CL Bool))
:premises ((not (ite phi1 phi2 phi3)))
:requires ((clEqual (cl (not phi1) (not phi2)) CL) true)
:match-conclusion CL
)
(declare-rule connective_def ()
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment