Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
Alethe
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Iterations
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Analyze
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
veriT
Alethe
Commits
74c14093
Commit
74c14093
authored
11 months ago
by
Hans-Jörg
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Fix example for onepoint proof rule
Addresses
#40
parent
8339601d
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline
#23743
passed
11 months ago
Changes
2
Pipelines
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
spec/changelog.tex
+1
-0
1 addition, 0 deletions
spec/changelog.tex
spec/rule_list.tex
+2
-2
2 additions, 2 deletions
spec/rule_list.tex
with
3 additions
and
2 deletions
spec/changelog.tex
+
1
−
0
View file @
74c14093
...
...
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ Clarifications and corrected errors:
omitted if the list is empty.
\item
Fix mistake in proof grammar. It now uses the
\texttt
{
context
\_
annotation
}
non-terminal in the rule for the
\texttt
{
anchor
}
command.
\item
Fix the example of
\proofRule
{
onepoint
}
.
\end{itemize}
\subsection*
{
0.3 ---
\DTMdisplaydate
{
2023
}{
02
}{
10
}{
-1
}}
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
spec/rule_list.tex
+
2
−
2
View file @
74c14093
...
...
@@ -1227,7 +1227,7 @@ An application of the \proofRule{onepoint} rule on the term $(\forall x, y.\, x
\rightarrow
(
f
\,
x
)
\land
(
f
\,
y
))
$
look like this:
\begin{AletheVerb}
(anchor :step t3 :args ((
:= y
x)))
(anchor :step t3 :args ((
x S) (:= (y S)
x)))
(step t3.t1 (cl (= x y)) :rule refl)
(step t3.t2 (cl (= (= x y) (= x x)))
:rule cong :premises (t3.t1))
...
...
@@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ An application of the \proofRule{onepoint} rule on the term $(\forall x, y.\, x
(step t3 (cl (=
(forall ((x S) (y S)) (=> (= x y) (and (f x) (f y))))
(forall ((x S)) (=> (= x x) (and (f x) (f x))))))
:rule
qnt
_
simplify
)
:rule
onepoint
)
\end{AletheVerb}
\end{RuleExample}
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment