Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 2ccc4517 authored by Hans-Jörg's avatar Hans-Jörg
Browse files

Add more things to changelog

parent 70003228
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline #7270 passed
\subsection*{Unreleased}
Apply major changes to the structure of the document to clarify the difference
between the \emph{language} and the \emph{rules}.
between the \emph{language} and the \emph{rules}. The language has a formal
definition and a proof of soundness. The syntax describes how proofs are
encoded in the text file.
The syntax was extended to allow extra annotations. Tools consuming Alethe
proofs must be able to ignore such extra annotations.
List of rules:
\begin{itemize}
\item Improve description of \proofRule{sko_ex}.
\item Add \proofRule{hole} rule to allow holes. A proof that contains
steps that use this rule is not valid.
\end{itemize}
\noindent
Corrections:
......@@ -20,6 +27,7 @@ Clarifications:
\item Add illustrating example to introduction.
\item Normalize printing of (variable, term) arguments in the abstract notation.
\item Fix linear arithmetic example in introduction.
\item Change syntax of abstract proof steps to be clearer.
\end{itemize}
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment