Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 18324875 authored by Hans-Jörg Schurr's avatar Hans-Jörg Schurr
Browse files

Fix typos in changelog

parent 99d28a75
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request!2Backport specification from my PhD thesis
This commit is part of merge request !2. Comments created here will be created in the context of that merge request.
......@@ -7,23 +7,21 @@ The standard now specifies that \texttt{assume} commands can only be
issued at the start of the proof or right after an \texttt{anchor}
command.
Beyond many smaller clarifications and typographic improvments, the
following changes were implemented in this release.
Beyond many smaller clarifications and typographic improvements, the
following changes are implemented in this release.
\begin{itemize}
\item An abstract proof checking procedure to clarify
the semantics of the proof format was added.
\item A description of the semantics of contexts based on λ-terms
was added.
\item The document now lists all transformations that are
implicit in Alethe proofs.
\item The notation used for terms from first-order style
(e.g., $f(x,g(y))$) was changed to higher-order style (e.g.,
\item Add an abstract proof checking procedure to clarify
the semantics of the proof format.
\item Add a description of the semantics of contexts based on λ-terms.
\item List all transformations that are implicit in Alethe proofs.
\item Change the notation used for terms from first-order style
(e.g., $f(x,g(y))$) to higher-order style (e.g.,
$(f\;x\;(g\;y))$). This is only a change in notation -- the used logic
remains many-sorted first-order logic.
\item There is no longer a distinction between if-and-only-if and
equaltiy. Instead equality (the symbol $$) is used with appropiate
\item Eliminate the distinction between if-and-only-if and
equality. Instead, use equality (the symbol $$) with appropriate
sorts.
\item An index that lists all proof rules was added.
\item Add an index that lists all proof rules.
\end{itemize}
Proof rules:
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment