From 23f6460f0cbf48dd9f5e470d36c2b2fa9f703ba3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ctroupin <charles.troupin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:52:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] new author; QC table
---
latex/AlborexData_ESSD.tex | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/latex/AlborexData_ESSD.tex b/latex/AlborexData_ESSD.tex
index 7006d1c..31136a5 100644
--- a/latex/AlborexData_ESSD.tex
+++ b/latex/AlborexData_ESSD.tex
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
\Author[6]{Miquel \`{A}ngel}{R\'{u}jula}
\Author[6]{Cristian}{Mu\~{n}oz}
\Author[6]{Eva}{Alou}
+\Author[6]{Inmaculada}{Ruiz}
\Author[7]{Antonio}{Tovar-S\'{a}nchez}
\Author[6]{John~T.}{Allen}
\Author[8]{Amala}{Mahadevan}
@@ -158,7 +159,26 @@ Profiling floats & 3 & 2014-05-25 & beyond the experiment & \checkmark & \
Automated data QC is part of the processing routine of SOCIB Data Center: most of the datasets provided with this paper come with a set of flags that reflect the quality of the measurements, based on different tests regarded the range of measurements, the presence of spike, the displacement of the platform and the correctness of the metadata.
-The QC are based on existing standards for most of the platforms. They are extensively described in the Quality Information Document \citep{SOCIBQC2018}. The description platform by platform is provided in the next Section.
+The QC are based on existing standards for most of the platforms. They are extensively described in the Quality Information Document \citep{SOCIBQC2018}. The description platform by platform is provided in the next Section. The flags used on the data are described in Tab.~\ref{tab:qc}
+
+\begin{table}[htpb]
+\caption{Quality Control Flags.\label{tab:qc}}
+\begin{tabular}{cl}
+\tophline
+Code & Meaning \\
+\middlehline
+0 & No QC was performed \\
+1 & Good data \\
+2 & Probably good data \\
+3 & Probably bad data \\
+4 & Bad data \\
+6 & Spike \\
+8 & Interpolated data \\
+9 & Missing data \\
+\bottomhline
+\end{tabular}
+\belowtable{} % Table Footnotes
+\end{table}
For some platforms, the automated QC are not implemented yet:
\begin{description}
@@ -197,15 +217,20 @@ In addition to the CTDs, the R/V thermosalinograph continuously acquired tempera
\subsubsection{Configuration}
-SeaÂâ€Bird SBE 911Plus, 2 conductivity and temperature sensors and 1 pressure sensor units
-SBE 43 oxygen sensor
-Seapoint [FTU] fluorescence and turbidity sensor
-
-The meteorological variables (air pressure, temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction) are acquired using a
-Manufacturer: GEÓNICA
+The CTD rosette was equipped with:
+\begin{itemize}
+\item a SeaÂâ€Bird SBE 911Plus, 2 conductivity and temperature sensors and 1 pressure sensor units,
+\item a SBE 43 oxygen sensor,
+\item a Seapoint [FTU] fluorescence and turbidity sensor.
+\end{itemize}
+The meteorological variables (air pressure, temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction) are acquired using GEONICA METEODATA 2000 weather station.
+The continuous, near-surface measurements of temperature and salinity are provided by a SeaBird SBE21 thermosalinograph.
\subsubsection{Quality checks}
+
+
+
\subsection{Gliders}
To collect measurements addressing the submesoscale, two gliders were deployed on May 25 inside the study area. The coastal glider carried out measurements up to 200~m depth and the deep glider up to 500~m. The horizontal resolution was about 0.5~km for the shallow and 1~km for the deep glider. The initial sampling strategy consisted in two 50-km long, meridional tracks, 10 kilometers away one from the other, and to repeat these tracks up to 4 times during the experiment. However, due to the strong zonal currents in the frontal zone, different tracks (Fig.~\ref{fig6:glidertracks}) crossing the front several times were made instead.
@@ -228,6 +253,10 @@ The total number of valid measurements (i.e., discarding the bad and missing val
The gliders follow a 3-dimensional trajectory in the water column but for some specific usages it is sometimes more convenient to have the glider data as if they were a series vertical profiles. To do so, a binning is applied on the original data, leading to the so-called Level-2 data, further described in Sec.~\ref{sec:processing}.
+\subsubsection{Configuration}
+
+The glider compass was also calibrated following \cite{MERCKELBACH2008}.
+
\subsection{Surface drifters}
@@ -286,6 +315,9 @@ The velocities exhibit a dominant eastward current with speed locally larger tha
The current profiler is an Ocean Surveyor ADCP (Teledyne RD Instruments) operating at 150KH
+This instrument was configured with a
+8-m depth bin and a total of 50 bins. Final velocity profiles were averaged in 10-min intervals.
+
\subsubsection{Quality checks}
--
GitLab